PROCAFE

PROCAFE is not one organization. It is a name that at least three separate coffee bodies use, in three different countries, with no connection between them.

This page exists mostly to stop you conflating them, because two of the three turn up in specialty coffee for completely different reasons and the third is the one nearly every link on this wiki actually means.

	What it is	Country	Why this wiki mentions it
PROCAFE (El Salvador)	A coffee research foundation — El Salvador’s working national breeding body after ISIC	El Salvador	Keeper of Pacas seed stock; El Salvador’s seat in the Central American breeding consortium
PROCAFE (Puerto Rico)	Productores de Café de Puerto Rico, Inc. — a growers’ nonprofit rebuilding the island’s coffee sector	Puerto Rico	Post-hurricane origin development; local roasting and green sample outreach
PROCAFE (Nicaragua)	A smallholder cooperative in San Juan del Río Coco	Nicaragua	Fairtrade, organic and regenerative-certified lots sold through importers

If you arrived here from Pacas, Pacamara, El Salvador, CATIE, CIRAD, ICAFE, IHCAFE or ANACAFÉ, you want the first one.

---

1. PROCAFE, El Salvador — the one this wiki links to

This is the body that took over El Salvador’s national coffee-research role from ISIC, the defunct state institute that bred Pacamara and put Pacas through pedigree selection.

Two things about it are verified, and both come from the same place: World Coffee Research’s variety catalogue, a technical reference maintained independently of El Salvador.

It holds the seed. The catalogue’s entry for Pacas — the dwarf Bourbon mutation that covers roughly a quarter of El Salvador’s crop — ends with a single flat sentence: “Seed stock is available from Procafe.”¹ That is the whole of the public record on how a farmer gets planting material for the country’s most-planted variety. Not a decree, not an annual report. One line in someone else’s catalogue.

It breeds. The same catalogue records a six-institution Central American consortium as the breeder of the F1 hybrids Centroamericano and Esperanza — CIRAD, the French tropical agriculture institute, plus CATIE in Turrialba, plus the four national coffee institutes: ICAFE (Costa Rica), IHCAFE (Honduras), PROCAFE (El Salvador) and ANACAFÉ (Guatemala).² Centroamericano is T5296 × Rume Sudan, released in 2010.² El Salvador’s seat in that group is PROCAFE’s, not ISIC’s — which tells you the handover had already happened by the time the consortium was working.

That is genuinely all that can be stated as fact. Which is the point of the next box.

To verify

PROCAFE El Salvador has no readable public existence, and this wiki cannot document its full name, legal form, founding date, or its succession from ISIC.

• Its own domain does not exist. procafe.com.sv was requested directly here and returned a DNS failure — the hostname does not resolve at all. This matches what Pacas and Pacamara already record. Whether the foundation is dormant, renamed, absorbed, or simply off the web cannot be determined from here.
• “PROCAFE succeeded ISIC” is trade shorthand, as the Instituto Salvadoreño de Investigaciones del Café note sets out at length. No decree, charter or official statement establishing a legal transfer was located by this wiki.
• No founding date, legal status or full name is asserted anywhere on this page, because no source consulted here gives one. The name is commonly expanded in the trade as a Salvadoran coffee research foundation, but that expansion could not be confirmed against any primary document. Do not quote a full name for it from this page.
• Note also the acronym trap: PROMECAFE, the regional Central American coffee research and modernisation programme, is a different body with a similar-looking name. Do not merge them.

To verify

The catalogue spells the consortium member differently from every other note on this wiki. Read directly, the World Coffee Research Centroamericano page gives the breeder string as “CIRAD-CATIE-ICAFE-IHCAFE-PROCABE-ANACAFE” — PROCABE, with a B.² This wiki’s CATIE, CIRAD, ICAFE, IHCAFE and ANACAFÉ notes all record it as PROCAFE. Given that the other five names in the string are correct and PROCABE matches no known organization, a typo in the catalogue is far more likely than a sixth institute nobody has heard of — but this wiki has not confirmed that, and the discrepancy is recorded here rather than quietly corrected.

Why it matters

El Salvador bred one of the highest-rated varieties in the world catalogue, and the organization that now holds the seed for its other signature variety cannot be reached on the internet. The institution that made Pacamara is defunct with no archive; its successor has no domain. The reason anyone can still say who bred what is that a third party in another country wrote it down — the same preservation lesson the Instituto Salvadoreño de Investigaciones del Café note draws.

---

2. PROCAFE, Puerto Rico — Productores de Café de Puerto Rico, Inc.

A different animal entirely: not a breeding institute but a growers’ advocacy and development nonprofit, formed in response to a disaster.

Its full legal name is Productores de Café de Puerto Rico, Inc., and it describes itself as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit.³ It was founded by local coffee growers in the wake of Hurricane María — the September 2017 storm that flattened Puerto Rico’s coffee sector — to defend growers’ rights and rebuild the industry sustainably.³ Its stated work is environmental restoration, education, and economic resilience for smallholder farmers and rural communities.³

So it sits on the advocacy-and-development side of the ledger, not the marketing-cooperative side. It is trying to get an origin’s farms functioning again, not to sell you a lot.

On the commercial edge, the research behind this note reports that PROCAFE roasts and distributes coffee locally under the brand Tierra Verde, a grocery home-delivery business, and has sent green samples to several specialty buyers — with no buyers named, no prices, and no cupping scores published.⁴

To verify

• The founding date is not stated. The homepage gives no incorporation year; it says only “post-Hurricane María” and, separately, “7 years of non-stop hard work.”³ That implies a founding around 2018, but the phrase is marketing copy on an undated page, not a record. No year is asserted here.
• No leadership is named. The site links a “Meet the Board” page but names no directors in the content read here.³ Any specific officer name would be a guess.
• The Tierra Verde and green-sample claims could not be read at source. The Daily Coffee News article they come from returned HTTP 403 Forbidden to an automated fetch here.⁴ They are reported above as claims with their source attached, not as verified fact.
• There are no cupping scores, auction results, prices or named international buyers attached to this organization in any source consulted. Anyone quoting a Cup of Excellence-style result for Puerto Rican PROCAFE is inventing it.

---

3. PROCAFE, Nicaragua — the San Juan del Río Coco cooperative

The third one is a smallholder cooperative, and it is the only one of the three you can actually buy coffee from through the specialty trade.

It was established on 11 May 2011 in San Juan del Río Coco, in Nicaragua’s Madriz department, starting with 32 members — 12 women and 20 men.⁵ It now has 165 members: 56 women and 109 men.⁵ Its stated purpose is to market and promote each member’s production and to turn them into “efficient and economically sustainable self-managed small businesses.”⁵

Certifications are the commercial hook. It received Organic and Fairtrade certification in 2011 — the same year it was founded — and achieved Regenerative Organic Certified (ROC) at the Silver level in 2021.⁵ ROC is a stacked standard: it requires organic certification as a floor and then adds soil-health, animal-welfare and social-equity criteria on top.

It owns its own dry mill, where it processes all of its own coffees.⁵ That matters more than it sounds. Dry milling — hulling, sorting and grading the dried parchment into exportable green — is usually where a smallholder group loses control and margin to a third party. Owning the mill means the cooperative keeps the sorting decisions, and the money, in-house.

The listed growing altitude is 900–1,350 metres above sea level, and the varieties are Catuaí, Caturra, Marsellesa and Parainema, fully washed.⁵

To verify

The research behind this note disagrees with the importer page as it actually reads today, on several specifics.

• Altitude. The brief cites this same Sucafina page for 800–1,370 m and a Covoya lot page for 800–1,350 m. Read directly, the Sucafina page gives 900–1,350 m.⁵ Use 900–1,350, and treat any lower floor as stale.
• Varieties and processing. The brief describes a natural / dry-processed lot with about 25 days of patio sun-drying, mesh-screen patios, a dry mill in Condega, Estelí, and varieties including Parainema, Marsellesa, Caturra and hybrids — all from a Covoya lot page.⁶ That page returned HTTP 404 when requested here. The Sucafina page read directly lists fully washed processing and includes Catuaí.⁵ These are not necessarily contradictory — an importer describes one lot, a supplier profile describes the whole cooperative — but nothing about natural processing, drying time or the mill’s town is verified.
• Member count. The brief notes a 156 figure on the Covoya page against 165 on Sucafina. Only 165 was confirmed here.⁵ A per-lot producer count and a cooperative-wide membership count are different numbers; don’t treat them as a correction of each other.
• No scores, no prices. No SCA cupping score, FOB price, auction result or named buyer is published for this cooperative in any source consulted, and there is no record of it entering Cup of Excellence or any ACE auction.

---

What to take away

The three PROCAFEs are a useful reminder that acronyms in coffee are not identifiers. “PROCAFE” is just pro + café — the most obvious possible name for any organization anywhere in the Spanish-speaking coffee world that wants to say “for coffee.” Three groups reached for it independently, and this wiki already carries a near-identical hazard on ISIC, where a Salvadoran breeding institute and a European coffee-and-health body share four letters. There is a fourth near-collision in Fundação Procafé, the Brazilian cultivar body — a different organization again, cited on IAPAR 59.

The more uncomfortable takeaway is the asymmetry. The Nicaraguan cooperative — 165 farmers — has its membership, certifications, altitudes and varieties published on two importer sites. The Puerto Rican nonprofit has a working homepage. The Salvadoran research foundation, which holds the seed stock for a variety planted across a quarter of a national crop and sits in the consortium that bred Centroamericano, has no reachable web presence at all. Visibility in this industry tracks who is selling, not who matters.

Related

• Instituto Salvadoreño de Investigaciones del Café — the defunct Salvadoran institute PROCAFE is generally described as succeeding
• El Salvador — the origin the Salvadoran PROCAFE serves
• Pacas — the variety whose seed stock the catalogue says comes from Procafe
• Pacamara — the Pacas × Maragogipe cross from the same breeding lineage
• CIRAD · CATIE · ICAFE · IHCAFE · ANACAFÉ — the other five members of the Central American breeding consortium
• World Coffee Research — keeper of the catalogue that is the only public record of the Salvadoran PROCAFE’s role
• Instituto Salvadoreño del Café · Consejo Salvadoreño del Café — the modern Salvadoran state coffee bodies
• Producer cooperatives — what the Nicaraguan PROCAFE is, structurally
• Dry milling — the step the Nicaraguan cooperative owns outright
• Catuaí · Caturra · Marsellesa — the varieties on its member farms
• Bourbon · Typica · Maragogipe — the lineages behind the Salvadoran varieties
• Coffee leaf rust — what drove the F1 hybrid breeding programme the consortium ran
• Washed process · Natural process — the processing categories at issue in the Nicaraguan lot descriptions
• Green coffee buying · Coffee supply chain — how a cooperative like this reaches a roaster
• Fundação Procafé — the Brazilian body with the confusingly similar name
• Cup of Excellence · Alliance for Coffee Excellence — the competition platforms none of the three appear in

Official links

• (no official website found) — PROCAFE El Salvador: procafe.com.sv does not resolve (DNS failure, checked directly). No replacement domain was located.
• Official site — PROCAFE (Productores de Café de Puerto Rico, Inc.)
• (no official website found) — PROCAFE Nicaragua: the cooperative has no own site located; it is documented publicly only through importer profiles such as the Sucafina page cited below.

Footnotes

1. World Coffee Research variety catalogue — Pacas ↩

2. World Coffee Research variety catalogue — Centroamericano ↩ ↩² ↩³

3. PROCAFE — Productores de Café de Puerto Rico, Inc. (official homepage) ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵

4. Daily Coffee News — Innovations at Origin: The Young Coffee Entrepreneurs of PROCAFE — returned HTTP 403 Forbidden to an automated fetch here; reported via this note’s research brief, not read at source. ↩ ↩²

5. Sucafina — Procafe Regenerative Organic Certified FW FTO ROC ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵ ↩⁶ ↩⁷ ↩⁸ ↩⁹

6. Covoya Specialty Coffee — Nicaragua FTO ROC Natural Process, Procafe — returned HTTP 404 when requested here. ↩